COVID-19 Charity

Establishing a COVID-19 Charitable Assistance Program

The widescale impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has left many low-income individuals and families throughout the country and world with an unexpected loss of critical income, while still faced with basic monthly living expenses, including rent, utilities, food, and medical costs.  Many charitable organizations, including those that do not typically provide emergency hardship assistance to individuals and families in need, are looking for ways to assist individuals and families during this challenging time. This FAQ provides answers to the key questions that 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations may have when considering the establishment of a financial hardship assistance program.

  1. Can my 501(c)(3) charitable organization conduct an emergency hardship assistance program, even if such assistance was not part of the stated purposes of my organization when it applied for tax-exempt status with the IRS?

With respect to federal tax law considerations, 501(c)(3) organizations do not have to obtain pre-approval from the IRS to provide emergency hardship or disaster relief assistance, including fundraising to make grants for such purpose.  However, if a public charity carries on emergency hardship and disaster relief assistance as one of its three largest programs, it will need to describe those services in the organization’s annual Form 990 filed with the IRS. The organization may also need to report grants and other assistance given to organizations or individuals within and outside the U.S., and noncash contributions received, such as donations of food or other supplies to distribute to families in need.

With respect to state law considerations, organizations should review their statement of legal purposes, as documented in their certificate of incorporation filed with the state in which they are incorporated.  Some organizations draft their statement of purpose very broadly to include any charitable purposes and activities that are permissible under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (which would include operation of a disaster or emergency hardship assistance program).  However, some organizations draft their statement of purposes narrowly.  If the organization’s legal purposes are drafted narrowly, and would not include the operation of a disaster or emergency hardship assistance program, the organization may need to amend the purposes in its certificate of incorporation to conduct the program.  In addition, organizations should use donations that were previously received for a different charitable purpose for those specified purposes only, and only apply new donations solicited for purposes that include disaster or emergency hardship assistance for that purpose.

  1. Can my organization solicit donations to support specific individuals or families in need?

An emergency hardship or disaster relief assistance program cannot be designed to serve any particular individuals, but rather, must be designed to assist a “charitable class.” An assistance program serves a charitable class” if the group of eligible beneficiaries is either: (1) large enough that the potential beneficiaries cannot be individually identified, or (2) sufficiently indefinite such that the entire community benefits from the charitable assistance.

If the group of eligible beneficiaries is limited to a smaller group, an assistance program will still be considered to benefit a charitable class if the group of beneficiaries is indefinite. For the group of beneficiaries to be indefinite, the program should be open-ended such that the total number of potential members making up the charitable class cannot be counted or identified. For example, if a financial assistance program is designed to benefit families of alumni from a particular college in connection with a current disaster or emergency as well as future disasters and emergencies, the program would be viewed as serving an indefinite charitable class.

  1. What kind of documentation must my organization maintain as part of an emergency assistance program?

In general, organizations must maintain adequate records to show that the organization’s assistance, whether in the form of tangible goods, services, or cash assistance, furthered charitable purposes, and that the recipients are needy or distressed.

Organizations providing emergency short-term assistance (e.g., hot food, clothing) to individuals in need of immediate assistance with basic necessities are not required to undertake a needs assessment. The organization should document the criteria for disbursing assistance (e.g., sudden loss of home and/or belongings), date/place of distribution, estimated number of individuals assisted, the charitable purpose intended to be accomplished, and the cost of the aid.

For longer-term assistance, organizations must maintain more detailed records to demonstrate that the organization has conducted an appropriate needs assessment which confirms that the individuals or families are financially in need. Being in financial need does not require individuals to be totally destitute; it is sufficient if they simply lack the resources to obtain basic necessities. An organization’s decision to provide financial assistance should be based on a reasonable determination that the individual’s financial resources, such as available cash, expenses, other financial obligations, assets that can be disposed of without causing further personal hardship, and anticipated cash flow (income, insurance proceeds, etc.), will be insufficient to provide for timely coverage of his/her existing obligations and basic needs.  Longer term financial assistance may include assistance with rent, mortgage payments or car loans to prevent loss of a primary home, utilities payments, and childcare and tuition costs for children.

Documentation relating to long-term assistance should generally include:

  • a complete description of the assistance provided,
  • costs associated with providing the assistance,
  • the purpose for which the aid was given,
  • the charity’s objective criteria for disbursing assistance under each program,
  • how the recipients were selected,
  • the name, address, and amount distributed to each recipient,
  • any relationship between a recipient and officers, directors, or key employees of, orsubstantial contributors to, the charitable organization, and,
  • the composition of the selection committee approving the assistance.
  1. How do we determine the appropriate amount of assistance to provide to families as part of our financial assistance program?

An organization’s decision about how much to distribute to individuals and families in need must be based on an objective evaluation of the individual’s needs at the time the grant is made.  The amount needed to relieve financial hardship and distress should be based on all the facts and circumstances of the individual’s situation and the charity’s resources.  Making an individual whole on account of a disaster or emergency hardship does not, necessarily, further charitable purposes. IRS guidance cautions that an outright transfer of funds based solely on an individual’s involvement in a disaster or without regard to meeting the individual’s particular distress or financial needs would result in private benefit, which is impermissible. Similarly, grants to replace lost income rather than to meet basic living needs would generally be viewed as serving personal and private interests, which is also impermissible.  Adequate documentation should be maintained to justify that the individual grants are appropriate in amount and further charitable purposes.

  1. Will recipients of financial hardship funds need to pay taxes on the amounts received from a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization?

Financial assistance that a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization gives to individuals or families in need for emergency hardship situations are excludible from the recipient’s gross income as a gift under Section 102 of the Internal Revenue Code.

  1. Can a public charity, private foundation, or donor-advised fund established by a company provide disaster or emergency hardship assistance to the company’s employees and their families as a result of COVID-19?

Companies can provide disaster or emergency hardship assistance to employees and their families in connection with the COVID-19 outbreak through these charitable vehicles, but as further discussed below, need to structure their programs in ways that do not provide impermissible private benefit to the employer.

Employer-sponsored public charities, which typically receive broad financial report from the general public and are subject to greater transparency requirements, may provide disaster or emergency hardship assistance to their employees and their family members, as long as a related employee does not exercise excessive control over the organization.  Typically, a significant portion of the board of such employer-sponsored public charities are individuals who are not in a position to exercise substantial influence over the affairs of the employer.

Employer-sponsored donor-advised-funds (DAFs) and private foundations are only allowed to provide assistance to employees and their family members if they’ve been affected by a “qualified disaster.” COVID-19 was officially declared a “qualified disaster” on March 13, 2020, so employer-sponsored DAFs and private foundations can provide payments to employees and their family members as long as there are safeguards in place to make sure the payments are for charitable purposes.

Employer-sponsored assistance programs should follow the program requirements discussed above (e.g., support of a charitable class, selection of recipients based on an objective determination of need, and adequate documentation of recipients’ need for assistance). In addition, the selection of beneficiaries must be made using either an independent selection committee or adequate substitute procedures to ensure that any benefit to the employer is incidental and tenuous. The selection committee is considered “independent” if a majority of the members of the committee are not in a position to exercise substantial influence over the affairs of the employer.  Pursuant to statutory restrictions applicable to donor-advised funds, no payment may be made from the DAF to or for the benefit of any director, officer, or trustee of the sponsoring public charity, or members of the fund’s selection committee.

Additional information about providing disaster relief assistance through charitable organizations, including employer-sponsored assistance programs, is available in IRS Publication 3833.

The information provided does not constitute legal advice, and is not intended to substitute for legal counsel.

 

 

Share this Post

Related Posts

As some states lift “stay-at-home” orders during the COVID-19 pandemic, nonprofit organizations and businesses may be considering whether to reopen their workplaces to get back to business.  When reopening, …
COVID-19 has been dominating the news, and with good reason.  While the situation is certainly “fluid,” it is likely that many organizations will continue to ask their employees to …
perlman & perlman philanthropic sector law firm blue logo

click to exit page

silk lanterns

who we work with

Our clients are diverse nonprofit organizations with a broad range of missions, as well as for-profit companies in evolving areas such as social enterprise, corporate philanthropy, joint ventures, technology-driven fundraising, and impact investing.

A.B. Data
AB InBev Foundation
Absolut Company
American Committee for the Weizmann Institute of Science
American Diabetes Association
American Friends of the Hebrew University
American Parkinson Disease Association
Americans for Ben Gurion University
Association of Fundraising Professionals
Avalon Consulting
Baton Rouge Area Foundation
Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation
Bleeding Blue for Good Fund
Bradley Cooper’s One Family Foundation
BrightFocus Foundation
Brooks Brothers
Chadwick Boseman Foundation for the Arts
Changing Our World
Charity Defense Council
Christian Appalachian Project
Doctors of the World/ Medecins du Monde
Doctors Without Borders/ Medecins San Frontieres
Drug Policy Alliance
Duke University
Emory University
Estee Lauder Companies, Inc.
Feed The Children
Food For The Poor
Gerald R. Ford Presidential Foundation
Grameen Foundation USA
Hope for New York
International Campaign for Tibet
International Crisis Group
International Justice Mission
J. Crew Group
Johns Hopkins University
Lautman Maska Neill & Company
Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law

LSU Foundation
Marts & Lundy
Meyer Partners, LLC
Milken Institute
NAACP Foundation
National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI)
National Marrow Donor Program
National Park Foundation
Natural Resources Defense Council
North Carolina State University
North Shore Animal League
Operation Smile
PBS Foundation
Pernod Ricard USA
PetSmart Charities
PopSockets
Population Action International
Project ORBIS International
Public Interest Communication
Rails to Trails
Redeemer Presbyterian Church
Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors
Save the Children Federation
Sesame Workshop
Simon Wiesenthal
SOS Children’s Villages – USA
Subaru of America
The Little Market
Touro University
United States Equestrian Team Foundation
United Way Worldwide
University of Connecticut
University of Virginia
Vote.org
Whitney Museum of American Art
World ORT
World Wildlife Fund
YWCA USA

A.B. Data
Absolut Company
American Committee for the Weizmann Institute of Science
American Diabetes Association
American Friends of the Hebrew University
American Parkinson Disease Association
Americans for Ben Gurion University
Association of Fundraising Professionals
Baton Rouge Area Foundation
BrightFocus Foundation
Burger King McLamore Foundation
Cancer Care
Carnegie East House and James Lenox House Association
Center for Car Donations
Changing Our World
Charity Defense Council
Christian Appalachian Project
Coca-Cola Scholars Foundation
Convoy of Hope
Cornell University
Doctors Without Borders/ Medecins San Frontieres
Drug Policy Alliance
Duke University
Emory University
Feed The Children
Gerald R. Ford Presidential Foundation
Grameen Foundation USA
Helen Keller Services
Hope for New York
Human Rights Watch
Humane Society of US
Indiegogo
International Campaign for Tibet
International Crisis Group
International Justice Mission
Japanese American National Museum
Johns Hopkins University
Lane Bryant Charities
Lautman Maska Neill & Company
Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law
LSU Foundation
Mattel
Meyer Partners, LLC
Milken Institute
National Breast Cancer Coalition
National Marrow Donor Program
Natural Resources Defense Council
North Carolina State University
North Shore Animal League
Obama Foundation
Operation Smile
PBS Foundation
Pernod Ricard USA
PetSmart Charities
Population Action International
Project ORBIS International
Public Interest Communication
Rails to Trails
Redeemer Presbyterian Church
Rock and Roll Hall of Fame and Museum
Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors
Sesame Workshop
Simon Wiesenthal
SOS Children’s Villages – USA
Steinhardt Foundation
Subaru of America
United States Equestrian Team Foundation
University of Montana Foundation
University of Nevada, Las Vegas Foundation
Whitney Museum of American Art
World ORT
World Wildlife Fund
YMCA USA
YWCA of New York City
YWCA USA

perlman & perlman philanthropic sector law firm blue logo

click to exit page

news & events

Our attorneys’ recent contributions to the media and nonprofit sector publications.

news & events

Check out our attorneys’ recent contributions to the media and industry publications.

Secure Your Data – Seriously, AFP New York Chapter News
As Jon Dartley, a data privacy and security attorney at Perlman and Perlman says, “It is vital to have the appropriate legal terms in the contract to protect your interests.”  Find out what your liability limit is.  Have it in writing who bears the responsibility and cost of a data breach.  And, have the vendor agree on a specific timeframe within which they need to advise you of a data breach.

Warning: Don’t Cut Legal Corners When Mixing Social And Business Impact,  Forbes
Particularly striking is that (Karen) Wu believes this is the “first multi-state regulatory activity involving cause marketing in almost two decades.”

Is stealing, then giving back, OK?
Cliff Perlman lends his advice on theft within a nonprofit.

Buyer Beware: Negotiating Terms in Technology Agreements
Jon Dartley provides tips on negotiating contracts with technology vendors.

Four Ways Charitable Giving Could Change with a Tax Overhaul
Cliff Perlman remarks on the possible threat of a change to charitable deduction.

How To Deal With Residual Data, Nonprofit Times
Jon Dartley’s advice on addressing “data exhaust”.

Secure Your Data – Seriously, AFP New York Chapter News
As Jon Dartley, a data privacy and security attorney at Perlman and Perlman says, “It is vital to have the appropriate legal terms in the contract to protect your interests.”  Find out what your liability limit is.  Have it in writing who bears the responsibility and cost of a data breach.  And, have the vendor agree on a specific timeframe within which they need to advise you of a data breach.

Warning: Don’t Cut Legal Corners When Mixing Social And Business Impact,  Forbes
Particularly striking is that (Karen) Wu believes this is the “first multi-state regulatory activity involving cause marketing in almost two decades.”

Is stealing, then giving back, OK?
Cliff Perlman lends his advice on theft within a nonprofit.

Buyer Beware: Negotiating Terms in Technology Agreements
Jon Dartley provides tips on negotiating contracts with technology vendors.

Four Ways Charitable Giving Could Change with a Tax Overhaul
Cliff Perlman remarks on the possible threat of a change to charitable deduction.

How To Deal With Residual Data, Nonprofit Times
Jon Dartley’s advice on addressing “data exhaust”.

perlman & perlman philanthropic sector law firm blue and green logo

click to exit page

perlman & perlman philanthropic sector law firm blue and green logo

click to exit page

silk lanterns

who we work with

Our clients are diverse nonprofit organizations with a broad range of missions, as well as for-profit companies in evolving areas such as social enterprise, corporate philanthropy, joint ventures, technology-driven fundraising, and impact investing.

who we work with

Our clients are diverse nonprofit organizations with a broad range of missions, as well as for-profit companies in evolving areas such as social enterprise, corporate philanthropy, joint ventures, technology-driven fundraising, and impact investing.

A.B. Data
AB InBev Foundation
Absolut Company
American Committee for the Weizmann Institute of Science
American Diabetes Association
American Friends of the Hebrew University
American Parkinson Disease Association
Association of Fundraising Professionals
Avalon Consulting
Baton Rouge Area Foundation
Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation
Bleeding Blue for Good Fund
Bradley Cooper’s One Family Foundation
BrightFocus Foundation
Brooks Brothers
Chadwick Boseman Foundation for the Arts
Changing Our World
Charity Defense Council
Christian Appalachian Project
Doctors of the World/ Medecins du Monde
Doctors Without Borders/ Medecins San Frontieres
Drug Policy Alliance
Duke University
Emory University
Estee Lauder Companies, Inc.
Feed The Children
Food For The Poor
Gerald R. Ford Presidential Foundation
Grameen Foundation USA
Hope for New York
International Campaign for Tibet
International Crisis Group
International Justice Mission
J. Crew Group
Johns Hopkins University
Lautman Maska Neill & Company
Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law
LSU Foundation

Marts & Lundy
Meyer Partners, LLC
Milken Institute
NAACP Foundation
National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI)
National Marrow Donor Program
National Park Foundation
Natural Resources Defense Council
North Carolina State University
North Shore Animal League
Operation Smile
PBS Foundation
Pernod Ricard USA
PetSmart Charities
PopSockets
Population Action International
Project ORBIS International
Public Interest Communication
Rails to Trails
Redeemer Presbyterian Church
Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors
Save the Children Federation
Sesame Workshop
Simon Wiesenthal
SOS Children’s Villages – USA
Subaru of America
The Little Market
Touro University
United States Equestrian Team Foundation
United Way Worldwide
University of Connecticut
University of Virginia
Vote.org
Whitney Museum of American Art
World ORT
World Wildlife Fund
YWCA USA

A.B. Data
Absolut Company
American Committee for the Weizmann Institute of Science
American Diabetes Association
American Friends of the Hebrew University
American Parkinson Disease Association
American Rivers
Association of Fundraising Professionals
Baton Rouge Area Foundation
BrightFocus Foundation
Burger King McLamore Foundation
Cancer Care
Carnegie East House and James Lenox House Association
Center for Car Donations
Changing Our World
Charity Defense Council
Christian Appalachian Project
Coca-Cola Scholars Foundation
Convoy of Hope
Cornell University
Doctors Without Borders/ Medecins San Frontieres
Drug Policy Alliance
Duke University
Emory University
Feed The Children
Gerald R. Ford Presidential Foundation
Grameen Foundation USA
Helen Keller Services
Hope for New York
Human Rights Watch
Humane Society of US
Indiegogo
International Campaign for Tibet
International Crisis Group
International Justice Mission
Japanese American National Museum
Johns Hopkins University
Lane Bryant Charities
LSU Foundation
Mattel
Meyer Partners, LLC
Milken Institute
National Breast Cancer Coalition
National Marrow Donor Program
Natural Resources Defense Council
North Carolina State University
North Shore Animal League
Obama Foundation
Operation Smile
PBS Foundation
Pernod Ricard USA
PetSmart Charities
Population Action International
Project ORBIS International
Public Interest Communication
Rails to Trails
Redeemer Presbyterian Church
Rock and Roll Hall of Fame and Museum
Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors
Sesame Workshop
Simon Wiesenthal
SOS Children’s Villages – USA
Steinhardt Foundation
Subaru of America
United States Equestrian Team Foundation
University of Montana Foundation
University of Nevada, Las Vegas Foundation
Whitney Museum of American Art
World ORT
World Wildlife Fund
YMCA USA
YWCA of New York City
YWCA USA
Lautman Maska Neill & Company
Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law

perlman & perlman philanthropic sector law firm blue and green logo

click to exit page

Culture & Values

Vision

We view our clients as partners that share our commitment to bring about change in the world. Our goal is to provide them the peace of mind of knowing that they are in compliance with their legal obligations and to further empower them to achieve positive social impact and financial success.

Our Mission

Our mission is to provide the highest quality, integrity-driven legal services to our clients, using a practical, consultative, client-focused approach to identify and respond to problems and challenges.

We strive to maintain a culture characterized by respect, opportunity, diligence, mutual empowerment, entrepreneurship, and fair reward for efforts made on behalf of clients and the firm.

Perlman & Perlman is a Certified B Corporation

Certified B Corporations use the power of business to solve social and environmental problems. B Corps are unlike traditional businesses because they

  • Meet comprehensive and transparent social and environmental performance standards
  • Meet higher legal accountability standards
  • Build business constituency for good business